Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read ElizaOS / AI16Z (Eliza Labs) against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
2 claimsThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #3[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Migration and Supply Expansion (October–November 2025)
“On October 8, 2025, Eliza Labs announced a migration from the original $AI16Z token”
reviewerMigration announced October 8, 2025The cited source predates the stated announcement date. The Oct 8 date may reflect a later v2 announcement, which I could not confirm.Proposed correction (not yet applied)On September 25, 2025, Eliza Labs announced a migration from the original $AI16Z token - #4[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“2025-10-08”
reviewerTimeline: migration announced 2025-10-08Same error as the section text.Proposed correction (not yet applied)2025-09-25
unverifiable
1 claimNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Migration and Supply Expansion (October–November 2025)
“According to official tokenomics documentation, the breakdown of new supply was: 60% to existing holders, 15% future protocol, 10% team/contributors, 5.5% liquidity and listings, 4.5% foundation, 2.5% protocol liquidity, and 2.5% ecosystem development.”
reviewerOfficial tokenomics documentation gives the percentage breakdown of new supplyThe cited docs page, as fetched, contains no percentages. The figures may come from an older version or another source.
stale
2 claimsThe claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.
- #1[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Federal Class Action Lawsuit (April 2026)
“The lawsuit is pending as of the date of this report; no verdict, settlement, or dismissal has been announced for this case.”
reviewerThe SDNY class action is still pending with no settlement announcedSuperseded by August 2026 reporting that the case settled, based on the founder's statement. The article does not mention court approval, so the correction attributes the claim to Walters.Proposed correction (not yet applied)In August 2026, Shaw Walters stated that the team had settled with a group of holders by transferring its remaining treasury and available funds; the settlement amount and terms were not disclosed. - #2[stale][awaiting moderator]in the summary
“As of April 2026 a federal class action lawsuit (SDNY case 1:26-cv-3238) is pending against Eliza Labs, founder Shaw Walters, co-defendant Sebastian Quinn-Watson, and AI16Z DAO.”
reviewerAs of April 2026 the class action is pendingThe 'as of April 2026' framing is out of date.Proposed correction (not yet applied)A federal class action lawsuit (SDNY case 1:26-cv-3238) was filed in April 2026 against Eliza Labs, founder Shaw Walters, co-defendant Sebastian Quinn-Watson, and AI16Z DAO; in August 2026 Walters stated it had been settled.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Migration and Supply Expansion (October–November 2025)
“The move expanded total token supply tenfold, from approximately 1.1 billion to 11 billion tokens.”
reviewerSupply expanded from approximately 1.1 billion to 11 billion; The Block source says nothing on supplyThe 11B total is confirmed. The official docs give a pre-migration supply of 6.6B, not 1.1B, so the tenfold claim conflicts with the project's own page. A 1:10 redenomination reported elsewhere may explain the discrepancy. - #7[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“2025-01-28”
reviewerRebrand to ElizaOS and a16z name demand around Jan 2025The rebrand and the Dixon remarks are supported, but the exact Jan 28 date is not confirmed. The Walters announcement appears to be a couple of days earlier. I am not proposing a correction.