Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Eleven Finance against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
2 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #4[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Recovery Plan and Compensation
“with the team reportedly taking on personal debt of approximately $688,000 beyond the recovered funds to fund this payment”
reviewerEleven Finance recovery plan details: Phase 1 25% (~$1.2M), team personal debt ~$688K, 849.2 BNB whitehat return, 11RV tokensThe Medium post could not be fetched. No alternative source was found for the recovery figures. - #5[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: ELE Token and Protocol Status
“The platform website (eleven.finance) appears to remain accessible, but community activity and development updates have dropped substantially since 2021–2022.”
reviewerWebsite remains accessible; protocol only appears largely inactiveA third-party aggregator says the project is discontinued with the site offline since September 2022. This conflicts with the page but is a single unverified source.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #1[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the summary
“draining approximately $4.5–4.8 million”
reviewerAttackers drained approximately $4.5-4.8 million from Nerve-partnership vaultsRekt gives about $4.5M and other reports about $4.6M. The $4.8M upper bound was not found in a source I could read.citedrekt.news/11-rekt - #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: The June 2021 Exploit
“The attacker's primary address was identified as 0x8b29.”
reviewerAttacker's primary address was 0x8b290x8b29 appears to be an attacker-deployed contract in PeckShield's trace, not clearly the primary address. Rekt names a different address. The truncated address is also not verifiable.citedrekt.news/11-rekt
confirmed
1 claimThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: The June 2021 Exploit
“The attacker first used a flash loan of approximately 953,869 BUSD via PancakeSwap”
reviewerFlash loan of about 953,869 BUSD via PancakeSwapMatches the figure reported from PeckShield's trace. The primary source was blocked, so this rests on a secondary report.