← Dabai Guaranteereviewed 2026-10-27 · 12 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Dabai Guarantee against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
1 claimThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #1[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Alleged Criminal Services
“Vendors require a minimum deposit of 500 USDT to launch campaigns on the platform.”
reviewerVendors require a minimum deposit of 500 USDT to launch campaignsThe report states no minimum deposit. The page turns an observed amount into a rule.Proposed correction (not yet applied)Many vendor campaigns on the platform were observed with deposits of around 500 USDT.
unverifiable
1 claimNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #11[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“Recorded Future / Insikt Group publishes report documenting Dabai Guarantee as a major active Chinese-language guarantee marketplace on Telegram, detailing its infrastructure, services, and vendor ecosystem.”
reviewerRecorded Future report dated 2026-04-22Date is plausible from the PDF filename but not confirmed on the page I could read.
partially supported
4 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #7[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Vendor Activity: Tajin Group
“Tajin Group's subsequent Xinbi deposit was 208,848 USDT — more than 230 times larger — suggesting significant operational expansion between the two platforms.”
reviewerTajin Xinbi deposit of 208,848 USDT stated as factThe figure is right, but the page presents a self-reported amount as fact. - #8[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Ecosystem Context: Successor Marketplace Dynamics
“the U.S. Secret Service simultaneously froze approximately $52.8 million in cryptocurrency linked to Xinbi.”
reviewerXinbi OFAC designation Sept 9, 2026 with simultaneous $52.8M Secret Service freezeThe designation date is correct. The freeze started September 8, not simultaneously with the designation. The same $52.8M freeze is repeated in the Enforcement Status section and in timeline[7] with the same date. - #9[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“U.S. Treasury OFAC designates Xinbi Guarantee as a significant transnational criminal organization; U.S. Secret Service freezes approximately $52.8 million in Xinbi-linked crypto.”
reviewerTreasury source cited for timeline entry with the $52.8M freezeThe Treasury URL does not carry the $52.8M figure; the Decrypt article does, and the freeze started a day earlier. - #12[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Enforcement Status
“As of September 2026, no publicly reported enforcement action — including DOJ charges, OFAC designation, Telegram channel seizure, or cryptocurrency freeze — has specifically targeted Dabai Guarantee.”
reviewerNo enforcement action targets Dabai specificallyA negative claim; my searches found no action, but searches are not exhaustive, and the page is dated as of September 2026 when today is late October 2026.
confirmed
6 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Platform Overview and Structure
“Dabai Guarantee is believed to have been founded in approximately December 2024, based on the creation date of its primary Telegram channel”
reviewerFounded approximately December 2024Hedged in line with the source. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Platform Overview and Structure
“a navigation directory (@dabai_a, approximately 15,372 subscribers), a main group (@dabai_c, approximately 19,225 members), a supply-and-demand channel (@dabaiyajing, approximately 17,085 subscribers)”
reviewerChannel names and subscriber countsMatches the report. - #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Criminal Services
“recorded 2,943 transactions, with a sample transaction of 10,629 USDT documented via the Tron network”
reviewerPublic Group 301 wallet 2,943 transactions; sample 10,629 USDTSupported. - #5[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Dabai Guarantee Public Group 301 (@DBTM301) established, focusing on sweeping operations in South Korea and Japan.”
reviewerPublic Group 301 established 2025-03-21Supported. - #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Vendor Activity: Tajin Group
“operated as a third-party vendor on Dabai Guarantee from May 2025 to April 2026”
reviewerTajin Group on Dabai May 2025 to April 2026, 141 members, 888 USDT deposit, ceased about April 10, 2026Supported. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Ecosystem Context: Successor Marketplace Dynamics
“had its backend infrastructure seized by the U.S. Department of Justice on June 23, 2026”
reviewerDOJ seized Huione backend infrastructure on June 23, 2026Supported.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.