Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← ChangeNOWreviewed 2026-09-09 · 18 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read ChangeNOW against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

disputed

1 claim

The reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.

  1. #11[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Structural Risk: No-Registration Model as Laundering Vector
    “The adoption of Monero's FCMP++ protocol upgrade, expected in a 2026 hard fork, has been flagged by observers as a development that may further limit the effectiveness of mid-transfer freezes like the one ChangeNOW executed in the Coinsbuy incident.”
    reviewerThe Monero FCMP++ protocol upgrade is 'expected in a 2026 hard fork' and may further limit forensic freeze effectiveness.The page's own cited source describes the FCMP++ fork as already completed days before the Coinsbuy hack, not as a future/expected 2026 event. This is a timing error that inverts the article's own framing (the hack post-dates the fork, rather than the fork being a future risk).
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    The adoption of Monero's FCMP++ protocol upgrade, which activated via hard fork days before the Coinsbuy hack in 2026, has been flagged by observers as a development that may further limit the effectiveness of mid-transfer freezes like the one ChangeNOW executed in the Coinsbuy incident.

unverifiable

1 claim

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #15[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory Status and Jurisdictional Risk
    “As of August 2026, no confirmed regulatory enforcement action by any government body — including the SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, OFAC, or any EU or UK regulator — has been filed against ChangeNOW.”
    reviewerAs of August 2026, no confirmed regulatory enforcement action by the SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, OFAC, or any EU/UK regulator has been filed against ChangeNOW.This is a negative claim (absence of enforcement action). No contradicting evidence was found across regulator sites and news search, which is consistent with the claim, but a clean negative cannot be fully confirmed by search alone — a comprehensive check would require direct queries of each named regulator's non-public docket status.

partially supported

2 claims

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #4[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: KYC and AML Policy
    “The platform's published AML/CFT compliance documentation, version 1.9, states that its framework is based on the FATF 40 Recommendations.”
    reviewerThe AML/CFT compliance documentation (v1.9) states its framework is based on the FATF 40 Recommendations.The document does reference FATF 40, but the page overstates a narrow definitional citation into a claim that the entire compliance framework is FATF-based.
  2. #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: KYC and AML Policy
    “Automated transaction monitoring using blockchain analytics tools — including Crystal Intelligence and AML Bot — is described as the primary screening layer.”
    reviewerAutomated transaction monitoring using blockchain analytics tools — including Crystal Intelligence and AML Bot — is the primary screening layer.Crystal (Crystal Intelligence) is directly confirmed in the cited compliance PDF. 'AML Bot' does not appear in any of the four cited sources or in independent searches of ChangeNOW's public compliance materials; it could not be verified.

confirmed

14 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
    “ChangeNOW is a non-custodial, KYC-optional instant cryptocurrency swap service founded in 2017 and operated by CHN Group LLC, incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.”
    reviewerChangeNOW is a non-custodial, KYC-optional instant swap service founded in 2017 and operated by CHN Group LLC, incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.Core corporate facts are directly confirmed by the company's own official pages and compliance filing.
  2. #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Overview and Corporate Structure
    “The legal entity is CHN Group LLC, incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, with a registered address at Euro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The company also maintains an operational address in Tallinn, Estonia.”
    reviewerChangeNOW's registered address is Euro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, SVG, and it maintains an operational address in Tallinn, Estonia.Both addresses are verified verbatim on official ChangeNOW sources.
  3. #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Overview and Corporate Structure
    “The company reports serving approximately 10 million users and processing more than 50,000 daily exchanges across 1,000+ cryptocurrencies on 110+ blockchains. It also operates a B2B API program with reportedly over 5,000 integration partners.”
    reviewerChangeNOW reports ~10 million users, 50,000+ daily exchanges, 1,000+ cryptocurrencies on 110+ blockchains, and 5,000+ B2B API partners.Figures are self-reported by ChangeNOW and correctly attributed as such ('reports', 'reportedly') rather than presented as independently audited.
  4. #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: KYC and AML Policy
    “ChangeNOW's incorporation jurisdiction, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, does not require a specific financial services license for this type of operation, meaning the company is not subject to the licensing and examination regime applicable to exchanges registered in the EU, UK, or US.”
    reviewerSVG does not require a specific financial services license for ChangeNOW's operations, limiting external regulatory oversight.Directly corroborated by ChangeNOW's own compliance filing.
  5. #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Appearance in Post-Exploit Fund Flows (2026)
    “On or around May 29–30, 2026, Cosmos-based cross-chain protocol Gravity Bridge lost approximately $5.4 million in a suspected validator signing-key compromise. Stolen assets included approximately $4.3 million in USDC, 274 ETH (~$553,000), $434,000 in USDT, and additional tokens.”
    reviewerGravity Bridge lost approximately $5.4 million on/around May 29-30, 2026 in a suspected validator signing-key compromise, comprising ~$4.3M USDC, 274 ETH (~$553,000), and $434,000 USDT.Figures and dating are confirmed by multiple independent outlets.
  6. #8[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Appearance in Post-Exploit Fund Flows (2026)
    “Security firm PeckShield reported that part of the stolen funds had already been laundered through ChangeNOW and Binance before investigators published their alert. As of the initial reporting, the exploiter was still holding approximately 2,102 ETH (~$4.23 million).”
    reviewerPeckShield reported that part of the stolen Gravity Bridge funds had already been laundered through ChangeNOW and Binance, and the exploiter still held ~2,102 ETH (~$4.23 million).Precise figures verified against the cited source.
  7. #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Appearance in Post-Exploit Fund Flows (2026)
    “On August 9, 2026, crypto payments processor Coinsbuy had wallets drained of more than $7.9 million across the Ethereum and TRON networks. On-chain monitoring firm Specter detected the outflows and published an alert. PeckShield identified ChangeNOW as one of three platforms — alongside FixedFloat and BingX — through which stolen funds were routed, as attackers attempted to convert proceeds into Monero.”
    reviewerOn Aug 9, 2026, Coinsbuy was drained of more than $7.9 million across Ethereum and TRON; Specter detected the outflows; PeckShield identified ChangeNOW, FixedFloat, and BingX as routing platforms as attackers attempted to convert proceeds to Monero.Although the CoinTelegraph article alone doesn't mention FixedFloat/BingX or PeckShield's role in platform identification, Crypto.news (also cited on the page) directly corroborates the PeckShield attribution and all three platforms.
  8. #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Appearance in Post-Exploit Fund Flows (2026)
    “According to blockchain investigator Specter and multiple outlets reporting on the incident, ChangeNOW reportedly froze a six-figure portion of the proceeds, limiting the full scope of the outflow. ChangeNOW had not issued a separate public statement confirming the exact frozen sum as of the time of initial reporting. The majority of funds from this hack remain unrecovered.”
    reviewerChangeNOW reportedly froze a six-figure portion of the Coinsbuy hack proceeds, limiting the outflow; ChangeNOW had not issued a separate public statement confirming the exact amount as of initial reporting; most funds remain unrecovered.Confirmed by the cited source; no source found stating the exact frozen amount or full fund recovery, consistent with the page's hedged phrasing.
  9. #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Law Enforcement Cooperation and Asset Recovery Track Record
    “ChangeNOW publicly documents a history of cooperation with law enforcement agencies across more than 70 jurisdictions.”
    reviewerChangeNOW documents cooperation with law enforcement across more than 70 jurisdictions.Directly confirmed.
  10. #13[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Law Enforcement Cooperation and Asset Recovery Track Record
    “Documented cases include: a September 2023 recovery of 10.6 BTC (approximately $430,000) related to a SIM swap hack; recovery of $210,000 from a fraudulent Uniswap app incident in cooperation with Romanian law enforcement; recovery of $100,000 in Bitcoin through partnership with AQ Forensics; and a $44,500 HBAR recovery assisted by the FBI. The company states it has recovered over $19 million from fraud-related losses in total across its operational history.”
    reviewerDocumented recovery cases include a Sept 2023 10.6 BTC (~$430,000) SIM swap recovery; a $210,000 Uniswap phishing-app recovery with Romanian law enforcement; a $100,000 BTC recovery via AQ Forensics; a $44,500 HBAR recovery with the FBI; and over $19 million recovered in total.All four named cases and the $19M aggregate figure are independently traceable across the two cited sources, though no single source lists all of them together.
  11. #14[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Law Enforcement Cooperation and Asset Recovery Track Record
    “ChangeNOW's attorney request guidelines describe a structured framework for processing law enforcement and legal requests, with processing times of 3 to 20 business days and a requirement for court orders before personally identifiable or KYC data is disclosed.”
    reviewerChangeNOW's attorney request guidelines describe processing times of 3 to 20 business days and require a court order before PII/KYC data is disclosed.Directly confirmed verbatim.
  12. #16[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Regulatory Status and Jurisdictional Risk
    “In August 2026, ChangeNOW co-published a financial privacy report with CoinRabbit arguing that crypto privacy tools serve essential protective functions and that privacy and compliance are not a zero-sum trade-off.”
    reviewerIn August 2026, ChangeNOW co-published a financial privacy report with CoinRabbit arguing privacy and compliance are not zero-sum.Confirmed by both cited sources and consistent with the timeline entry dated 2026-08-04.
  13. #17[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
    “Coinsbuy crypto payments platform wallets drained of over $7.9 million across Ethereum and TRON. Attackers route a portion of funds through ChangeNOW, FixedFloat, and BingX in an attempt to convert proceeds into Monero.”
    reviewerCoinsbuy hack timeline entry: attackers routed a portion of funds through ChangeNOW, FixedFloat, and BingX in an attempt to convert proceeds into Monero (2026-08-09).Consistent with the corresponding section-level finding above.
  14. #18[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
    “Reporting confirms that ChangeNOW froze a six-figure portion of the Coinsbuy hack proceeds mid-transfer, per blockchain investigator Specter. ChangeNOW had not issued a separate public statement confirming the exact amount as of initial reporting.”
    reviewerReporting confirms ChangeNOW froze a six-figure portion of Coinsbuy proceeds mid-transfer per Specter, with no separate public statement on the exact amount as of initial reporting (2026-08-10).Consistent with section-level finding.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.