Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read ChainSwap against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
2 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #3[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: First Exploit — July 2, 2021 (~$800,000)
“ChainSwap's team responded quickly — shutting down all nodes and deploying a fix within approximately 30 minutes”
reviewerTeam shut down nodes and deployed a fix within ~30 minutes after first exploitThe cited Decrypt article does not state a 30-minute response; other cited sources not checked for this. - #5[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Current Status and Rebranding
“announced a rebranding to ChainHub in January 2026”
reviewer@ChainSwapERC announced rebranding to ChainHub in January 2026X is not readable. A ChainHub name appears on one aggregator, but no announcement or January 2026 date was found.citedx.com/chainswaperc
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Second Exploit — July 10-11, 2021 (~$4.4M–$8M)
“Direct losses to the bridge totaled approximately $4.4 million”
reviewerAttacker wallet held about $4.4M; page says this is direct bridge lossThe $4.4M is the value held by the attacker across partner tokens, not necessarily losses of the bridge itself. - #6[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the summary
“the project's native CHAINS/ASAP token collapsed over 96% from its all-time high”
reviewerToken fell over 96% (summary) vs over 99% (section)Internally inconsistent: ATH ~$3.62 to ATL ~$0.002 is over 99% as the section states, and the summary's 96% understates it. Price figures not independently checked.
confirmed
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Second Exploit — July 10-11, 2021 (~$4.4M–$8M)
“with the attacker minting 20 million Wilder World (WILD) tokens alone, which were sold for roughly 650 WBNB (~$200,000) via PancakeSwap. The attacker cashed out approximately 456 ETH (~$935,000) through 1inch using bridged BSC liquidity.”
reviewerSecond exploit attacker address, 20M WILD minted and sold for ~650 WBNB, 456 ETH cashed out via 1inch (~$935,000)Rekt confirms the figures and address. - #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Suspicious Circumstances and Insider-Job Allegations
“Rekt.news noted that the attacker funded their wallet via Tornado Cash (a privacy mixer) but then converted stolen proceeds to centralized stablecoins such as USDT”
reviewerAttacker funded via Tornado Cash and converted to USDT; page raises insider possibilityRekt only poses the insider question rhetorically; the page appropriately hedges as alleged.