Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Bitfinex Hackreviewed 2026-10-27 · 6 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Bitfinex Hack against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

unverifiable 3partially supported 1confirmed 20 corrections pending · 0 applied

unverifiable

3 claims

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #3[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Early Releases (2025–2026)
    “Morgan was released after serving approximately eight months of her 18-month sentence.”
    reviewerMorgan was released after about eight months of her 18-month sentenceNo cited source for this sentence, and the Dec 2025 BOP release date seems at odds with an eight-month stay. I could not settle it.
  2. #5[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Asset Recovery and Restitution
    “A formal transfer of the coins from government custody to Bitfinex had not been completed as of mid-2026.”
    reviewerFormal transfer of the coins not completed as of mid-2026I found no 2026 source confirming or denying that the transfer happened.
  3. #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “Lichtenstein is released from federal prison to home confinement (January 2) after about 14 months, crediting the First Step Act.”
    reviewerLichtenstein released to home confinement January 2, 2026 after about 14 months, crediting the First Step ActI did not fetch the cited articles. The claim is consistent with the multiple independent outlets cited, but I did not check it directly.

partially supported

1 claim

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #4[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “A U.S. federal court orders in-kind restitution of about 94,000 BTC to Bitfinex through plea-agreement provisions after ruling Bitfinex does not qualify as a 'victim' under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act.”
    reviewerCourt ordered in-kind restitution of about 94,000 BTC to Bitfinex in 2025Crypto outlets (BeInCrypto, Bitcoin.com) report an order, but Wikipedia and the Cointelegraph report on the judge's reservations show the status was unsettled. I found no docket confirmation. The page presents a single outlet's account as established.

confirmed

2 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
    “steal about 119,756 BTC, worth approximately $72 million at the time”
    reviewerRoughly 119,756 BTC (about $72 million) stolen in the August 2016 breach, about $58 million after the price fell about 20%Matches the fetched Wikipedia article.
  2. #2[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
    “were sentenced in November 2024”
    reviewerLichtenstein sentenced to 60 months and three years supervised release; Morgan to 18 monthsThe DOJ page fetch returned only a stub, so exact days (Nov 14 and Nov 18) rest on my background knowledge and the page's own CoinDesk citation, not on a page I could read.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.