Version history
Every immutable snapshot of Axiom Exchange — Employee Insider Trading Scandal. A new version is saved each time the page changes, with the reason it changed. Pick two versions to see exactly what changed.
- v8currentTrust score: 202026-10-27 18:41:59Z
Fact-check reviewFact-check review (verdict: revise): the reviewer checked the page's claims against its sources; the trust score did not change.
hash: b7957f25be1d…changes from v7 - v7Trust score: 202026-10-17 03:28:22Z
Community evidenceA moderator accepted a piece of community-submitted evidence: CoinDesk confirms ZachXBT's allegation that Axiom employee Broox Bauer used internal dashboards to look up user wallet data and shared it with a group tracking influencer trades, ZachXBT's caveat about hard-to-establish high-confidence insider trading, the Polymarket controversy, and Axiom's statement that it revoked tool access and would investigate — matching the submission's note in full. Trust score now 20.
hash: C3418Po8FvrT…changes from v6 - v6Trust score: 232026-10-17 02:34:40Z
Community evidenceA moderator accepted a piece of community-submitted evidence: The Block confirms ZachXBT's allegation that Axiom employee 'Broox' used internal tools to view private user wallet data and a plan to help a colleague profit $200,000 via the same tools, plus the Polymarket contract titled about ZachXBT exposing a crypto company. Trust score now 23.
hash: DfjVSxmSDR5M…changes from v5 - v5Trust score: 252026-10-16 20:29:56Z
Community evidenceA moderator accepted a piece of community-submitted evidence: DL News confirms the allegations against Axiom employee Broox Bauer: internal tool misuse to track customer wallets over roughly 10+ months starting a few months after the January 2025 launch, an alleged plan to help an associate profit $200,000, and Axiom's response, matching the note. Trust score now 25.
hash: Ek4C1F3qBmxj…changes from v4 - v4Trust score: 262026-10-10 18:43:19Z
Score recalculatedRescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 20 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −71, concerns that are not fraud −6, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.9; legitimacy credit long-running +4; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.
hash: 94d38a62bde2…changes from v3 - v3Trust score: 202026-10-02 05:26:05Z
No reason was recorded for this version (saved before October 2026).
hash: cd19ed796ea0…changes from v2 - v2Trust score: 302026-10-02 05:26:05Z
No reason was recorded for this version (saved before October 2026).
hash: 01826b350b0e…changes from v1 - v1Trust score: 302026-08-26 15:39:49Z
No reason was recorded for this version (saved before October 2026).
hash: b6f42de93c06…