Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Aurum Foundationreviewed 2026-10-27 · 4 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Aurum Foundation against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

unverifiable 2partially supported 1confirmed 10 corrections pending · 0 applied

unverifiable

2 claims

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #2[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Neyro Rebrand and NEYRO Token
    “On July 30, 2026, Aurum Foundation announced it had been hacked”
    reviewerAurum Foundation announced it had been hacked on July 30, 2026 and BehindMLM characterised it as an alleged exit-scam pretextPrimary source could not be read. A search summary is consistent with a collapse and a claimed security incident but is not a verification of the exact dates. Not scored.
  2. #3[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory Actions
    “The Securities and Exchange Commission issued a fraud warning on January 22, 2026”
    reviewerNigeria SEC, Greece HCMC, NZ FMA, Poland KNF, France AMF, ASIC, SFC, Belgium FSMA warning datesBehindMLM and FMA pages blocked. A search summary independently reported warnings from Nigeria, Greece, NZ, Australia (twice), Hong Kong, Belgium, Finland and Russia, which supports the existence of the warnings but not the exact dates. Poland criminal referral and France blacklisting not independently checked.

partially supported

1 claim

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #4[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory Actions
    “at least ten jurisdictions”
    reviewerReports that the regulators listed number at least ten jurisdictionsThe page lists exactly ten entries, one of which (Finland) is stated with no date or source. The count is consistent with the search results but Finland is thinly supported on the page.

confirmed

1 claim

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Regulatory Actions
    “with a detection date of July 18, 2025 and an update recorded on October 7, 2025”
    reviewerBank of Russia warning list entry has detection date July 18, 2025 and update October 7, 2025Both dates match the Bank of Russia entry.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.