{"investigation":{"slug":"resupply","entity_name":"Resupply","trust_score":32,"severity_base":null,"score_modifier":0,"confidence":0.82,"status":"published","content_type":"investigation","summary":"Resupply (resupply.fi / resupply.finance) is a decentralized stablecoin lending protocol built by contributors from Convex Finance and Yearn Finance, succeeding the hacked Prisma Finance protocol after a March 2024 governance vote. The protocol suffered a critical $9.6 million exploit on June 26, 2025, caused by a donation-attack vulnerability in a newly deployed ERC-4626 vault, with stolen funds laundered through Tornado Cash. The team's post-exploit governance response generated significant community controversy, including alleged silencing of critics and a disputed insurance-pool burn proposal, before the bad debt was eventually fully repaid in August 2025.","sections":[{"content":"Resupply was formally introduced through governance proposal PIP-46, which passed in late 2024 and called for the shutdown of Prisma Finance and the introduction of Resupply as its successor protocol. Prisma Finance had itself suffered an $11.6 million exploit on March 28, 2024, in which attackers exploited the MigrateTroveZap contract, causing TVL to collapse from approximately $220 million to $107 million. Following that incident, Prisma never fully recovered. A governance proposal on the Prisma forum then introduced Resupply — built on the FraxLend codebase by Convex and Yearn contributors — as the protocol successor, with PRISMA token holders allowed to redeem for vesting RSUP tokens. The transition represents the second generation of a protocol lineage that has now experienced two significant security incidents.","heading":"Protocol Background and Predecessor (Prisma Finance)","sources":[{"url":"https://gov.prismafinance.com/t/pip-46-shutdown-prisma-finance-introduce-resupply/232","name":"gov.prismafinance.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/03/29/prisma-finance-hacker-claims-11-6-million-whitehat-rescue/","name":"cryptotimes.io","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://immunebytes.com/blog/prisma-finance-exploit-march-28-2024-detailed-analysis/","name":"immunebytes.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/prisma-finance-exploited-10-million","name":"cointelegraph.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"Resupply is a collateralized debt position (CDP) protocol allowing users to supply crvUSD or frxUSD into Curve Lend or Fraxlend markets and borrow reUSD stablecoin against those positions. The protocol was developed by contributors from Convex Finance and Yearn Finance, with Convex Finance confirming on its official X account that both teams developed the protocol. Token distribution allocates 20% to the Convex protocol sub-DAO and 10% to the Yearn protocol sub-DAO, both vesting over five years, with 2% allocated to the team over one year. The protocol features an insurance pool mechanism intended to absorb losses from at-risk positions. No individual founders are publicly named. The team describes the contracts as immutable and non-custodial.","heading":"Protocol Design and Team","sources":[{"url":"https://x.com/ConvexFinance/status/1876252394045985148","name":"x.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://docs.resupply.fi/resupply-governance/tokenomics","name":"docs.resupply.fi","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://resupply.finance/","name":"resupply.finance","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/resupply-usd-reusd","name":"iq.wiki","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"On June 26, 2025, Resupply was exploited for approximately $9.6 million in a donation attack targeting a newly deployed ERC-4626 crcrvUSD vault. The vault had been live for only approximately 95 minutes before the attack. According to on-chain analysis by BlockSec, the attack proceeded as follows: (1) The attacker flash-loaned 4,000 USDC from Morpho and converted it to crvUSD. (2) The attacker donated 2,000 crvUSD directly to the newly deployed vault. (3) The attacker then deposited approximately 2 crvUSD to mint just 1 wei of shares. (4) This manipulation caused the vault's internal price calculation to produce an astronomically inflated value, and because the Resupply pair contract calculated its exchange rate as a division of 1e36 by that price, integer floor division caused the exchange rate to round down to zero. (5) With a zero exchange rate, the protocol's solvency checks were bypassed, allowing the attacker to deposit 1 wei of crcrvUSD collateral and borrow the entire 10 million reUSD borrowing limit. (6) The attacker converted the stolen reUSD through Curve and Uniswap into approximately 1,581 ETH in USDC and wrapped Ether, then laundered the proceeds through Tornado Cash. The root cause was the failure to seed the newly deployed vault with initial liquidity or to implement protections against the known ERC-4626 empty-vault donation attack vector. Halborn security noted that Curve's own documentation already indicated applicability constraints for this implementation, which Resupply failed to account for.","heading":"June 2025 Exploit: Technical Details","sources":[{"url":"https://blocksecteam.medium.com/blocksec-in-depth-analysis-and-reflections-on-the-resupply-protocol-attack-incident-932be23e1433","name":"blocksecteam.medium.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-resupply-hack-june-2025","name":"halborn.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://decrypt.co/327148/hacker-drained-9-6-million-from-defi-stablecoin-protocol-resupply","name":"decrypt.co","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.guardrail.ai/blog/resupplyfi-hack","name":"guardrail.ai","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/0ca5a-hacker-drains-9-6-million-from-resupply","name":"cryptorank.io","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"The immediate market impact of the exploit included: reUSD depegging to approximately $0.98 following the incident; total protocol TVL declining from approximately $135 million to $85 million; and the team emergency-pausing the wstUSR market and setting borrow limits to zero. Only the wstUSR market was directly impacted by the exploit. The attacker distributed stolen funds to two addresses before routing approximately 2,280 ETH (valued at roughly $9.8 million) through Tornado Cash. PeckShield confirmed the Tornado Cash laundering. The protocol's governance token RSUP also experienced sell pressure in the aftermath.","heading":"Exploit Impact and reUSD Depeg","sources":[{"url":"https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/caa3441e-5a92-415f-b8b7-81b54052db44","name":"panewslab.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://cryptocurrencynewscast.online/resupplyfi-exploiter-launders-9-8-million-in-stolen-eth-via-tornado-cash/","name":"cryptocurrencynewscast.online","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/defi-stablecoin-lending-protocol-resupply-hit-with-93m-exploit/","name":"dlnews.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://cryptopotato.com/stablecoin-protocol-resupply-suffers-9-5m-exploit/","name":"cryptopotato.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/resupply-fi-hacked-for-9-6m-who-has-been-affected/","name":"coinspeaker.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"The Resupply team's post-exploit communication was widely criticized. According to a Medium analysis by Crypto Labs, the team issued only a three-sentence tweet following the attack and did not initiate a bounty program or disclosed chain-tracing efforts. Discord moderators allegedly banned users who raised critical questions, including banning major investor Yishi Wang (OneKey founder), who had reportedly suffered over $2 million in personal losses. Wang publicly characterized the team's proposed recovery plan as 'essentially a false insurance scheme' that shifted developer liability onto users, stating that the insurance pool was designed for unpredictable events, not basic coding mistakes. Wang further called the incident 'not a black swan event; it is a man-made disaster, a serious oversight at the development level.' Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov allegedly threatened legal action against Wang for 'smearing Curve's reputation,' which generated additional community backlash. OneKey subsequently clarified that Wang's statements represented his personal views as an investor, not company policy. The aicoin.com reporting on this controversy describes the team as having 'mocked investors raising legitimate concerns.'","heading":"Governance Controversy and Post-Exploit Response","sources":[{"url":"https://crypto-labs.medium.com/post-hack-silence-governance-failure-deconstructing-resupplys-9-6m-a338cd9a70b7","name":"crypto-labs.medium.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.aicoin.com/en/article/469162","name":"aicoin.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/176r70wk","name":"panewslab.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"In late June 2025, Resupply published a formal recovery plan. The total bad debt from the exploit amounted to approximately $10 million reUSD. Of this, the protocol's treasury repaid 2.86 million reUSD directly. The DAO then proposed burning 6 million reUSD from the insurance pool — representing 15.5% of total insurance pool holdings — to cover the bulk of remaining losses. The residual 1.13 million reUSD in losses would be carried by the DAO and repaid gradually through future protocol revenue, including fees and potential RSUP token sales. To incentivize insurance pool depositors to remain rather than withdraw, Resupply offered 2.5 million RSUP tokens as a retention incentive. The proposal was put to a DAO vote, with implementation to begin three days after community approval. The Block reported on the burn proposal in late June 2025.","heading":"Recovery Plan: $6 Million reUSD Burn Proposal","sources":[{"url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/360226/resupply-six-million-burn","name":"theblock.co","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2025/06/30/resupply-plans-6m-reusd-token-burn-to-recover-from-10m-hack/","name":"cryptotimes.io","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://crypto.news/resupply-protocol-outlines-recovery-plan-post-10m-exploit-proposes-6m-token-burn/","name":"crypto.news","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/tech/resupply-protocol-outlines-recovery-plan-post-10m-exploit-proposes-6m-token-burn/","name":"bitcoinethereumnews.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"By August 2025, Resupply announced the full repayment of all $10 million in bad debt created by the June 2025 exploit. The repayment was accomplished using a combination of treasury funds, the insurance pool burn, and support from Convex and Yearn sub-DAOs. The protocol also developed and deployed sreUSD, a savings reUSD product with an 'off-peg boost' mechanism intended to restore market confidence in the peg. The reUSD price returned to approximately $0.99 by the time of the repayment announcement. While the bad debt repayment represents a positive outcome for affected depositors, the governance controversy and the precedent of using user insurance funds to cover a developer error remain points of contention in the DeFi community.","heading":"Full Repayment of Bad Debt (August 2025)","sources":[{"url":"https://www.ainvest.com/news/resupply-fully-repays-10-million-bad-debt-june-2025-exploit-2508/","name":"ainvest.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/27733819837209","name":"binance.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/resupply-usd","name":"coingecko.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"Resupply's official documentation states the protocol's smart contracts were 'reviewed by peers and top security auditors,' but does not name specific audit firms on its primary website. Halborn published a post-mortem analysis of the exploit, but was not listed as a pre-exploit auditor of the affected contract. The Veridise security firm published a post-exploit commentary identifying the vulnerability type as one that could have been caught with proper audit procedures focused on empty-vault edge cases in ERC-4626 implementations. The ResupplyFi audit coverage page on Auditium.io provides additional detail. Multiple security firms noted that the ERC-4626 donation attack vector is a documented and well-known issue, and that repeated instances across DeFi suggest inadequate institutional security memory. The exploit bypassed prior audits because the vulnerability only manifested under precise timing conditions — specifically when a new vault was deployed with zero initial liquidity within a narrow window.","heading":"Audit and Security Posture","sources":[{"url":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-resupply-hack-june-2025","name":"halborn.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://veridise.com/blog/audit-insights/resupplyfi-hack-audit-habit/","name":"veridise.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://auditium.io/resources/resupply/","name":"auditium.io","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://blocksecteam.medium.com/blocksec-in-depth-analysis-and-reflections-on-the-resupply-protocol-attack-incident-932be23e1433","name":"blocksecteam.medium.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"},{"content":"Resupply is the direct successor to Prisma Finance, which suffered an $11.6 million exploit in March 2024. Prisma's attacker at the time claimed the exploit was a 'whitehat rescue,' a claim the community disputed. Prisma never recovered its TVL following that incident and was eventually wound down in favor of Resupply. The Resupply exploit in June 2025 means that the same underlying team and protocol lineage — Convex and Yearn contributors working on Curve-adjacent lending infrastructure — has now been associated with two significant security incidents totaling over $21 million in losses. The Crypto Labs analysis characterized this as 'a troubling cycle of inadequate accountability,' noting that Prisma's losses went unresolved for nine months before the rebrand. Critics have drawn attention to this pattern as a concern for users evaluating whether the project's governance and security culture have materially improved.","heading":"Systemic Risk: Protocol Lineage and Repeat Incidents","sources":[{"url":"https://crypto-labs.medium.com/post-hack-silence-governance-failure-deconstructing-resupplys-9-6m-a338cd9a70b7","name":"crypto-labs.medium.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/03/29/prisma-finance-hacker-claims-11-6-million-whitehat-rescue/","name":"cryptotimes.io","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://gov.prismafinance.com/t/pip-46-shutdown-prisma-finance-introduce-resupply/232","name":"gov.prismafinance.com","type":"other","credibility":3},{"url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/prisma-finance-exploited-10-million","name":"cointelegraph.com","type":"other","credibility":3}],"severity":"medium"}],"timeline":[{"date":"2024-03-28","event":"Prisma Finance (Resupply predecessor) exploited for $11.6 million via MigrateTroveZap contract vulnerability; TVL collapses from $220M to $107M.","source":""},{"date":"2024-12","event":"Governance proposal PIP-46 passes, shutting down Prisma Finance and introducing Resupply as successor protocol built on FraxLend codebase by Convex and Yearn contributors.","source":"","date_original":"2024-12-01"},{"date":"2025-01-07","event":"Convex Finance officially announces Resupply on X, describing it as a new stablecoin protocol developed jointly by Convex and Yearn.","source":""},{"date":"2025-05-17","event":"Resupply deploys a new LlamaLend Market via Curve's factory.","source":""},{"date":"2025-05-31","event":"Governance proposal for the new market is published and subsequently passes on-chain.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-26","event":"At 00:18 UTC, crcrvUSD Market 0x6e90 is deployed. At 01:53 UTC (approximately 95 minutes later), attacker executes donation attack using a $4,000 flash loan, draining approximately $9.6 million in reUSD. At 02:53 UTC, protocol pauses the affected market.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-26","event":"reUSD depegs to approximately $0.98; protocol TVL drops from ~$135M to ~$85M. Resupply confirms breach via X and promises a post-mortem.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-27","event":"Attacker routes stolen funds through Tornado Cash. Controversy erupts over team's three-sentence public response. OneKey founder Yishi Wang publicly criticizes the governance response and discloses $2M+ personal losses.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-27","event":"Curve founder Michael Egorov allegedly threatens legal action against Yishi Wang over public criticism. Community backlash intensifies.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-30","event":"Resupply publishes formal recovery plan: $2.86M treasury repayment already made; proposes 6M reUSD insurance pool burn; 1.13M reUSD to be repaid via future revenue; 2.5M RSUP tokens offered as retention incentive.","source":""},{"date":"2025-08","event":"Resupply announces full repayment of all $10 million in bad debt from the June 2025 exploit, using treasury funds, insurance pool, and Convex/Yearn sub-DAO support.","source":"","date_original":"2025-08-01"},{"date":"2025-08-12","event":"PeckShield confirms attacker transferred 2,280 ETH (approximately $9.8M) through Tornado Cash, completing money laundering of stolen proceeds.","source":""}],"sources_used":[{"url":"https://gov.prismafinance.com/t/pip-46-shutdown-prisma-finance-introduce-resupply/232","name":"gov.prismafinance.com","type":"other","archive_url":null,"credibility":3,"archive_error":"error:no-job","archive_status":"unarchivable","archive_timestamp":null},{"url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/03/29/prisma-finance-hacker-claims-11-6-million-whitehat-rescue/","name":"cryptotimes.io","type":"other","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260829085419/https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/03/29/prisma-finance-hacker-claims-11-6-million-whitehat-rescue/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T08:54:19+00:00"},{"url":"https://immunebytes.com/blog/prisma-finance-exploit-march-28-2024-detailed-analysis/","name":"immunebytes.com","type":"other","archive_url":null,"credibility":3,"archive_error":"error:not-found","archive_status":"unarchivable","archive_timestamp":null},{"url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/prisma-finance-exploited-10-million","name":"cointelegraph.com","type":"other","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260829113610/https://cointelegraph.com/news/prisma-finance-exploited-10-million","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T11:36:10+00:00"},{"url":"https://x.com/ConvexFinance/status/1876252394045985148","name":"x.com","type":"other","archive_url":null,"credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":null},{"url":"https://docs.resupply.fi/resupply-governance/tokenomics","name":"docs.resupply.fi","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260415091142/https://docs.resupply.fi/resupply-governance/tokenomics","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-04-15T09:11:42+00:00"},{"url":"https://resupply.finance/","name":"resupply.finance","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260618015645/https://resupply.finance/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-06-18T01:56:45+00:00"},{"url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/resupply-usd-reusd","name":"iq.wiki","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20251118005820/https://iq.wiki/wiki/resupply-usd-reusd","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2025-11-18T00:58:20+00:00"},{"url":"https://blocksecteam.medium.com/blocksec-in-depth-analysis-and-reflections-on-the-resupply-protocol-attack-incident-932be23e1433","name":"blocksecteam.medium.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20251126141759/https://blocksecteam.medium.com/blocksec-in-depth-analysis-and-reflections-on-the-resupply-protocol-attack-incident-932be23e1433","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2025-11-26T14:17:59+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-resupply-hack-june-2025","name":"halborn.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260802123835/https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-resupply-hack-june-2025","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-02T12:38:35+00:00"},{"url":"https://decrypt.co/327148/hacker-drained-9-6-million-from-defi-stablecoin-protocol-resupply","name":"decrypt.co","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260311041528/https://decrypt.co/327148/hacker-drained-9-6-million-from-defi-stablecoin-protocol-resupply","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-03-11T04:15:28+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.guardrail.ai/blog/resupplyfi-hack","name":"guardrail.ai","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260802123835/https://www.guardrail.ai/blog/resupplyfi-hack","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-02T12:38:35+00:00"},{"url":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/0ca5a-hacker-drains-9-6-million-from-resupply","name":"cryptorank.io","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260829074858/https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/0ca5a-hacker-drains-9-6-million-from-resupply","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T07:48:58+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/caa3441e-5a92-415f-b8b7-81b54052db44","name":"panewslab.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20251106020840/https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/caa3441e-5a92-415f-b8b7-81b54052db44","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2025-11-06T02:08:40+00:00"},{"url":"https://cryptocurrencynewscast.online/resupplyfi-exploiter-launders-9-8-million-in-stolen-eth-via-tornado-cash/","name":"cryptocurrencynewscast.online","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260212042955/https://cryptocurrencynewscast.online/resupplyfi-exploiter-launders-9-8-million-in-stolen-eth-via-tornado-cash/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-02-12T04:29:55+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/defi-stablecoin-lending-protocol-resupply-hit-with-93m-exploit/","name":"dlnews.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260703045656/https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/defi-stablecoin-lending-protocol-resupply-hit-with-93m-exploit/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-07-03T04:56:56+00:00"},{"url":"https://cryptopotato.com/stablecoin-protocol-resupply-suffers-9-5m-exploit/","name":"cryptopotato.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260410201736/https://cryptopotato.com/stablecoin-protocol-resupply-suffers-9-5m-exploit/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-04-10T20:17:36+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/resupply-fi-hacked-for-9-6m-who-has-been-affected/","name":"coinspeaker.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260510012552/https://www.coinspeaker.com/resupply-fi-hacked-for-9-6m-who-has-been-affected/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-05-10T01:25:52+00:00"},{"url":"https://crypto-labs.medium.com/post-hack-silence-governance-failure-deconstructing-resupplys-9-6m-a338cd9a70b7","name":"crypto-labs.medium.com","type":"other","archive_url":null,"credibility":3,"archive_error":"error:no-request","archive_status":"unarchivable","archive_timestamp":null},{"url":"https://www.aicoin.com/en/article/469162","name":"aicoin.com","type":"other","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260829042418/https://www.aicoin.com/en/article/469162","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T04:24:18+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/176r70wk","name":"panewslab.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20251111133822/https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/176r70wk","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2025-11-11T13:38:22+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/360226/resupply-six-million-burn","name":"theblock.co","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260115122503/https://www.theblock.co/post/360226/resupply-six-million-burn","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-01-15T12:25:03+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2025/06/30/resupply-plans-6m-reusd-token-burn-to-recover-from-10m-hack/","name":"cryptotimes.io","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260802124405/https://www.cryptotimes.io/2025/06/30/resupply-plans-6m-reusd-token-burn-to-recover-from-10m-hack/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-02T12:44:05+00:00"},{"url":"https://crypto.news/resupply-protocol-outlines-recovery-plan-post-10m-exploit-proposes-6m-token-burn/","name":"crypto.news","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20251016214349/https://crypto.news/resupply-protocol-outlines-recovery-plan-post-10m-exploit-proposes-6m-token-burn/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2025-10-16T21:43:49+00:00"},{"url":"https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/tech/resupply-protocol-outlines-recovery-plan-post-10m-exploit-proposes-6m-token-burn/","name":"bitcoinethereumnews.com","type":"other","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260829024137/https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/tech/resupply-protocol-outlines-recovery-plan-post-10m-exploit-proposes-6m-token-burn/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T02:41:37+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.ainvest.com/news/resupply-fully-repays-10-million-bad-debt-june-2025-exploit-2508/","name":"ainvest.com","type":"other","archive_url":null,"credibility":3,"archive_error":"error:no-request","archive_status":"unarchivable","archive_timestamp":null},{"url":"https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/27733819837209","name":"binance.com","type":"other","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260829083419/https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/27733819837209","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T08:34:19+00:00"},{"url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/resupply-usd","name":"coingecko.com","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260619225105/https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/resupply-usd","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-06-19T22:51:05+00:00"},{"url":"https://veridise.com/blog/audit-insights/resupplyfi-hack-audit-habit/","name":"veridise.com","type":"other","archive_url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260829120704/https://veridise.com/blog/audit-insights/resupplyfi-hack-audit-habit/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-08-29T12:07:04+00:00"},{"url":"https://auditium.io/resources/resupply/","name":"auditium.io","type":"other","archive_url":"http://web.archive.org/web/20260511185859/https://auditium.io/resources/resupply/","credibility":3,"archive_timestamp":"2026-05-11T18:58:59+00:00"}],"source_tags":["defillama"],"addresses":[],"reviewed":false,"reviewed_by":null,"model_used":"claude-sonnet-4-6","created_at":"2026-05-04T02:54:22.722638+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-30T07:44:38.689377+00:00"}}