← AnubisDAOreviewed 2026-10-27 · 10 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read AnubisDAO against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
3 claimsThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #1[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Fund Laundering (2022–2023)
“while another report dates the laundering of 1,018 ETH (about $1.18 million at prevailing prices) through Tornado Cash, in 100 ETH increments, to July 15–16, 2022”
reviewerThe 1,018 ETH Tornado Cash laundering, in 100 ETH increments, occurred on July 15-16, 2022The July 15-16 100 ETH batches are the 2023 event. The 1,018 ETH figure is from the June 24, 2022 reports. The page merges the two and dates them to 2022, which makes the 'reports differ' framing a false discrepancy.Proposed correction (not yet applied)and crypto.news, also in June 2022, reported that 1,018 ETH (about $1.18 million at prevailing prices) had been laundered through Tornado Cash by that time - #2[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“1,018 ETH (~$1.18M) from wallets linked to the drain is laundered through Tornado Cash in 100 ETH tranches on July 15–16, 2022, per another report.”
reviewerTimeline entry for 1,018 ETH laundering is dated July 2022 and describes July 15-16, 2022 tranchesThe cited source is dated June 24, 2022 and does not mention July 15-16 or 100 ETH tranches.Proposed correction (not yet applied)crypto.news reports that 1,018 ETH (~$1.18M) from an intermediate address linked to the drain had been laundered through Tornado Cash. - #3[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“2022-07”
reviewerTimeline date for the crypto.news 1,018 ETH reportSource is June 2022, which duplicates the preceding The Block entry.Proposed correction (not yet applied)2022-06
unverifiable
1 claimNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #7[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Competing Narratives: Rogue Developer vs. Phishing Claim
“said 'the critical mistake was giving full control of the liquidity pool to a single developer'”
reviewerDecrypt reports a direct statement attributed to the co-founder 0xSisyphus asserting the incident was not phishingProtos and Cointelegraph were not fetched; the quote was not located in Decrypt.
stale
1 claimThe claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.
- #4[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Fund Laundering (2022–2023)
“The use of Tornado Cash after the OFAC sanctions may create additional legal exposure for the perpetrators, though no enforcement action has been announced.”
reviewerPost-sanction Tornado Cash use may create legal exposure (OFAC sanctions presented as current)The page frames the sanctions as live leverage; they were lifted in 2025. The legal-exposure speculation is unsourced and weaker now.Proposed correction (not yet applied)The use of Tornado Cash after the OFAC sanctions was made while those sanctions were in force; Treasury removed the economic sanctions against Tornado Cash on March 21, 2025. No enforcement action has been announced.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Fund Laundering (2022–2023)
“The Block reported in June 2022 that the funds had moved for the first time, with 1,018 ETH sent through Tornado Cash”
reviewerETH moved for the first time in June 2022 with 1,018 ETH sent through Tornado Cash (The Block)Date and 1,018 ETH figure hold; 1,097 ETH was the amount moved and 1,018 the part laundered. - #8[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Allegations Linking 0xSisyphus to a Former OpenSea Executive
“OpenSea said it was 'unaware' of any involvement by Pawlak in the projects described and that he had held a limited-scope, non-management role.”
reviewerZachXBT called the NFT Ethics thread 'one of the most mid-curve' analyses; OpenSea said Pawlak left in June 2023 with limited scopeCore holds. 'Non-management' and the Alameda detail are not in the Cointelegraph article. The page also omits that Lookonchain raised the allegation. Cointelegraph also notes ZachXBT said Sisyphus could face a civil case.
confirmed
3 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Competing Narratives: Rogue Developer vs. Phishing Claim
“Beerus said he was cooperating with police and 'complying with all investigations'.”
reviewerDrain happened about 20 hours into the sale; about $60M; Beerus (@cryptofan777) claimed phishing and said he was cooperating with policeDecrypt does not mention a PDF; that detail and the 0xSisyphus quote need other sources (not checked). - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Large-scale Tornado Cash laundering resumes in 100 ETH increments, at a time when the 13,556 ETH is worth about $26M”
reviewer13,556 ETH was worth about $26M in July 2023 as Tornado Cash laundering resumed in 100 ETH batches on July 15-16The 'largest ETH depositor to Tornado Cash in 2023' clause is not in this article and was not verified. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: On-Chain Forensics and ZachXBT Analysis
“ZachXBT noted that Beerus's wallet bsl.eth had sent 95 ETH to the Ersan-linked address.”
reviewerZachXBT traced 95 ETH from Beerus's address to an Ersan-linked address; Ersan linked to CSGORollThe page attributes the CSGORoll link to Ersan without crediting analyst Warren; it is an allegation, not a finding.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.