Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Andean Medjedovic against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
1 claimNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #4[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Money Laundering and Tornado Cash Activity
“The same wallet cluster was reported to still hold more than $29 million, including about 11,861 ETH and 796 wstETH.”
reviewerThe wallet cluster still holds more than $29 million including 11,861 ETH and 796 wstETHNot in the DL News article; may be in another cited outlet, which I did not check.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Indexed Finance Exploit (October 2021)
“Reports differ on the exact day: October 14, 2021 according to the DOJ Office of Public Affairs release”
reviewerDOJ OPA release gives October 14, 2021 as the Indexed Finance exploit dateThe attribution of the specific day to the OPA release was not found on the fetched page. The month and the DOJ-level facts are otherwise supported by other reporting. Not marked disputed because the summariser may have dropped detail. - #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“A U.S. DOJ filing states the defendant is 'believed to be at large in Bosnia.'”
reviewerTimeline entry attributes the January 2025 DOJ 'believed at large in Bosnia' filing to a Balkan Insight article dated 2026-01-30Not independently fetched. The source is a 2026 article reporting a 2025 filing, so it is a secondary citation. The primary filing was not checked.
confirmed
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: U.S. Federal Indictment (February 2025)
“Maximum statutory penalties are 10 years on the computer damage count and 20 years on each of the other four, a combined maximum of 90 years.”
reviewerFive-count EDNY indictment unsealed Feb 2025 with stated counts and maximum penalties (10 years on computer damage, 20 on each other count, 90 combined)DOJ release matches counts, penalties and agency lists. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Money Laundering and Tornado Cash Activity
“while DL News, citing blockchain investigator Specter, reports about $13.5 million in Ether as of April 30, 2026”
reviewerDL News, citing Specter, reports about $13.5 million in Ether moved to Tornado Cash around April 30, 2026; cumulative nearly $25M; attribution unclearMatches, and the page carries the attribution caveat.